Audit of care for children aged 6 to 59 months admitted with severe malnutrition at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya

Article Outline

• Summary
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Materials and methods
  • 2.1. Study design, study site and subjects
  • 2.2. Data collection
  • 2.3. Data management
• 3. Results
  • 3.1. Audit of the Process of Care
  • 3.2. Triage
    • 3.2.1. Step 1: Treat/prevent hypoglycemia
    • 3.2.2. Step 2: Treat/prevent hypothermia
    • 3.2.3. Step 3: Treat/prevent dehydration
      • 3.2.3.1. PFC
      • 3.2.3.2. Ward care
      • 3.2.3.3. Blood Transfusion Practices
    • 3.2.4. Step 4: Correct electrolyte imbalance
    • 3.2.5. Step 5: Treat infections routinely
    • 3.2.6. Step 6: Correct micronutrient deficiencies
    • 3.2.7. Step 7: Initial feeding
    • 3.2.8. Step 8: Catch-up feeds
  • 3.3. Caregiver's Knowledge and Practices
• 4. Discussion
• Authors’ contributions
• Funding
• Conflict of interest
• Ethical approval
• References
• Copyright

Summary 

We conducted a prospective audit of 101 children aged 6 to 59 months, admitted to Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) with severe malnutrition, from February-April 2008. Forty-seven per cent (47/101) of children were younger than one year old. Overall, 58% (59/101) of children had marasmus, 70.3% (71/101) had diarrhoea and 51.5% (52/101) had pneumonia on admission. A structured tool was prepared to capture data to allow assessment of implementation of WHO guidelines steps 1–8. The highest degree of implementation (91/101, 90%) was observed for Step 5: treatment of potentially severe infections, although only 55% (56/101) of patients had F75 prescribed even though this starter formula was available. There was modest implementation of Step 2: ensuring warmth (47/101, 46.5%), Step 3: treatment of dehydration (39/71, 54.9%) and Step 4: correction of electrolyte imbalance (46/101, 45.5%). There was least implementation of Step 8: transition to catch-up feeding (16/67, 23.8%). There was a delay in initiating feeds with a median time of 14.7hours from the time of admission. We conclude that quality of care for children admitted with severe malnutrition at KNH, Kenya's largest tertiary level health facility, is inadequate and often does not follow WHO guidelines. Improving care will require a holistic and not simply medical approach.

Keywords: Severe malnutrition, Process of care, Treatment, Implementation, Audit, WHO guidelines

Back to Article Outline

1. Introduction 

Malnutrition is a common cause of preventable morbidity and mortality among children in developing countries and is a risk factor for illness and death in an estimated 60% of the almost 10 million deaths from preventable causes for children aged below five years.¹, ², ³, ⁴, ⁵ Clinically severe malnutrition is also an important problem in hospitals in economically poor countries and is associated with very poor outcomes.⁶, ⁷ Despite an improved understanding in the pathophysiology of this condition over the last five decades, hospital mortality rates of severe malnutrition have remained high, with rates of up to 50% being reported.³, ⁸, ⁹, ¹⁰ Much of this high inpatient mortality has been attributed to outdated and inappropriate clinical care.³, ¹¹, ¹², ¹³

In an effort to improve the quality of hospital care for severely malnourished children and reduce case fatality rates, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed clinical guidelines with 10 steps that need to be followed in the inpatient care of severe malnutrition.¹ The guidelines have been adopted by the Ministry of Health in Kenya and incorporated into their Basic Paediatric Protocols.¹⁴ The rationale for following these 10 steps is based on studies that provide evidence that their use results in improvement of care and a decline in case fatality.¹³, ¹⁵, ¹⁶, ¹⁷, ¹⁸ In a review of 140 studies on management of severe malnutrition in developing countries, Bhan et al., found evidence that careful assessment and appropriate treatment using WHO standardized protocols reduced morbidity and mortality from rates as high as 40-50% to some as low as 6%.¹²

As mortality from severe malnutrition remains a significant problem in Kenya's largest teaching and referral hospital we carried out a prospective audit of care for patients aged 6–59 months admitted with severe malnutrition (a) to determine the current practices in inpatient care of severely malnourished children at KNH (b) to determine the proportion of children appropriately managed according to WHO's first eight steps of care.

Back to Article Outline

2. Materials and methods 

2.1. Study design, study site and subjects 

The study was a hospital-based prospective audit for patients admitted with severe malnutrition in general paediatric wards of Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH). KNH is an 1800 bed hospital that serves both as a teaching hospital and a national, tertiary referral health facility. Clinical care was provided by Consultant paediatricians, Resident Pediatricians (paediatricians-in-training), Medical Officers, Clinical Officers (diploma-level clinicians), nurses and nutritionists. Sick children were first triaged, assessed and provided with immediate care in a walk-in paediatric filter clinic (PFC). The Resident Pediatricians and Medical Officers were responsible for the definitive initial evaluation and management of patients. Most of the clinicians but very few of the nurses had undergone training in Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment PLUS (ETAT+) which incorporates inpatient care for severe malnutrition.¹⁹

We studied children aged 6–59 months admitted with severe malnutrition as defined in the WHO guidelines.¹ To provide moderate precision (95% confidence intervals+/−10%) around estimates of the proportion of children receiving care representing adherence to the guidelines we aimed to study 100 children.

2.2. Data collection 

The principal investigator visited the general paediatric wards daily between 08:00 and 21:00h and recruited consecutive eligible patients. Case records were reviewed on day seven and on death or discharge. Relevant information was abstracted and entered in a pro-forma sheet. Information collected was supplemented with information obtained through a structured interview with caregivers and direct, daily observations on the wards.

Caregivers of living children were interviewed at the end of the first week using an open ended, structured questionnaire on the care given to the child in the early phase of treatment.

An inventory of commodities necessary for the management of severe malnutrition was completed by the principal investigator and the availability and reliability of supplies was explored using a self administered questionnaire completed by ward-based nurses and nutritionists. The latter asked staff to rate availability of items on a four point scale as: never available, rarely available, usually available or always available.

2.3. Data management 

Data were cross checked for completeness, accuracy, and consistency prior to analysis with SPPS version 14 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Weight for height (WH) Z-scores were calculated using EPINUT (EpiInfo, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA). Chi square or Fisher's Exact tests were used for comparing categorical data, and Student's t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous data. Simple summaries of inventory findings, views on availability of supplies, staff and caregiver perceptions were prepared.

Back to Article Outline

3. Results 

We recruited 101 children over a period of three months from 1st February to 28th April 2008. Of these, 58 (57%) were boys and 43 (43%) were girls giving a male: female ratio of 1.4:1.

The most frequent type of severe malnutrition was marasmus (59/101, 58%), followed by marasmic-kwashiorkor (27/101, 27%) and kwashiorkor (15/101, 15%). Gender was not associated with a specific form of severe malnutrition (p=0.085.) The median age was 13.0 months with a range of 6–59 months; 85.1% (86/101) of the children were aged below 24 months. Children with marasmus were significantly younger than those with kwashiorkor and marasmic-kwashiorkor. The mean age for children with marasmus was 14.4 months (SD±8.5), kwashiorkor 21.9 months (SD±13.8) and marasmic-kwashiorkor 18.7 months (SD±10.6) (ANOVA p=0.019). The median WHZ score was −3.5 with no significant difference between the clinical groups. Common co-morbid clinical conditions documented at admission were diarrhoea (71/101, 70.3%) and pneumonia (52/101, 51.5%). Some patients had more than one co-morbidity.

Thirty eight patients died, a case fatality rate of 38% during the study period; half of the deaths occurred in the first 48hours of admission on the ward. Commercially prepared F75 and F100 and ReSoMal were largely available during the study (Table 1). In fact, most resources required were present (Table 1) with the exception of Zinc or WHO combined mineral-vitamin mix. However, none of the wards had wall chart guidelines on the management of severe malnutrition.

Table 1. Availability of essential supplies for management of severely malnourished children in KNH reported by ward-based health workers (n=50).

3.1. Audit of the Process of Care 

We describe the audit of the process of care given to the patients recruited in the study in regard to steps 1-8. Steps one and three are primarily initiated in the PFC while other steps relate solely to management provided on the paediatric wards. The results are collectively summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Interventions given in steps 1–8 for the management of severely malnourished children.

Interventions done in each step	Frequency (%)	95% CI
Step 1: Treatment and prevention of hypoglycemia
Random blood sugar done in PFC or on admission	30/101
Feeding within 1 hour of ward admission (excludes 71 patients with diarrhoea)	6/30
Median waiting time from the time of admission on the ward to initial feeding (n=101)	14.7hours
Step 2: Treatment and prevention of hypothermia
Correct management of hypothermia	47 (46.5%)	36.8–56.2
Step 3: Treatment and prevention of dehydration
Documented history of diarrhoea in PFC	64/101
Hypovolemic shock in PFC	14/64
Correctly managed for shock in PFC	2/14
Inappropriate use of IVF in patients not in shock in PFC	15/50
Correctly managed for diarrhoea (no shock) in PFC	13/50
Correct Step 3 in the PFC	15/64 (23.4%)	13.8–35.7
Documented history of diarrhoea on the ward	71/101
Hypovolemic shock on the ward	4/71
Inappropriate use of IVF in patients not in shock on the ward	19/67
Correctly managed for shock on the ward	2/4
Correctly managed for diarrhoea (no shock) on the ward	37/67
Correct Step 3 on the wards	39/71(54.9%)	43.3–66.5
Step 4: Correction of electrolyte imbalance
Prescribed correct volume of F75	46/101
Given furosemide	4/101
Correct Step 4	46/101 (45.5%)	35.6–55.8
Step 5: Treatment of infections routinely
Prescribed penicillin only	3/101
No antibiotics at all	2/101
Correct dose of penicillin and (gentamycin or chloramphenicol*)	91/101
Correct Step 5 Choice of antibiotics and dosage	91/101 (90%)	85.1–96.9
Step 6: Correction of micronutrient deficiencies
Vitamin A correctly prescribed	49/101
Step 7: Initial re-feeding
Prescribed F75	56/101
Prescribed correct volume of F75	46/101
Route of feeding specified	37/56
Feed intake monitored	18/56
Step 8: Catch-up feeding
Proportion started on F100	43/67
Correct F100 volume	27/43
Feed volume increased after transition period	16/43 (37.2%)
Correct Step 8	16/67 (23.8%)	13.6–34.0

^*Chloramphenicol was used for children suspected to have meningitis.

3.2. Triage 

Over 90% of children were appropriately triaged for emergency or priority care in the PFC.

Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of hypoglycemia were inadequately done at both PFC and on the wards. A total of 30 (29.9%) children had random blood sugar (RBS) done in either PFC or the wards though glucometers and glucose strips were largely available throughout the study period (Table 1). Two children had RBS less than 3mmol/l and were appropriately managed with 10% dextrose. No feeding or presumptive treatment for hypoglycemia was documented at PFC. There was a long delay in initiating feeds on the wards with median waiting time of 14.7hours. Only six of the 30 (20%) children who did not have diarrhoea were fed within the first hour of arrival on the ward. Overall 34% of the patients received their initial feed after 19hours of admission on the ward.

All wards had separate malnutrition rooms with electric heaters but only 47 children were kept warm with the rest nursed together with well nourished children. Children were admitted with their mothers, however only 14% of mothers were given instructions on how to keep their children warm through proper clothing and minimal washing and exposure. Monitoring of temperature was rarely done at admission or during hospitalization.

3.2.3.1. PFC 

Sixty four children were documented to have diarrhoea, and 14 of them were in hypovolemic shock. Most children in hypovolemic shock were treated with normal saline contrary to the guidelines. Indiscriminate use of intravenous fluids in children not in shock was common. Twenty one children not in shock were appropriately rehydrated with ReSoMal, but only 13 (62%) of them received the correct volume.

3.2.3.2. Ward care 

Management of shock was better than in PFC with half of the children appropriately managed. Indiscriminate use of IVF for children not in shock was, however, still documented. Forty children were rehydrated with ReSoMal, out of whom 92.5% got the correct volume. Monitoring for signs of over hydration and deterioration was rarely done.

3.2.3.3. Blood Transfusion Practices 

Twelve (11.9%) children were transfused during the study period. Four of them had hemoglobin (Hb) of less than 5gm/dl. Another four had Hb more than 5gm/dl and the remaining four had no documented Hb results and were transfused based on clinical judgment. Out of the twelve only one child had correct volume of blood transfused.

Approximately 56(55%) of children were prescribed commercially prepared F75 and thus should have received appropriate potassium supplementation, minerals and trace elements. However only 46 (46%) had the correct volume prescribed. Children not prescribed F75 were also not prescribed supplemental potassium. Four children with edematous malnutrition were erroneously given furosemide for their edema.

Children were routinely given antibiotics with 90% of children receiving broad spectrum antibiotics as per WHO recommendations.

A total of 56 children (55%) received high dose vitamin A on day one, out of whom 72% received the correct dose for age. There was no documentation in the medical notes on previous Vitamin A administration prior to admission. Iron was appropriately not prescribed in the acute phase but neither was it prescribed later in the rehabilitation phase.

Only 55% of children were fed with F75 in the initial phase though pre-mixed formula was available. This was mainly due to failure of doctors to prescribe it. The rest were fed on ward ‘special milk’ (a relatively high calorie/high protein milk), whole cow's milk and a few on routine ward diet. Children continued with breast feeding where applicable. The average volume of F75 where prescribed was 125ml/kg per day and 82% of those started on F75 received more than 80% of calculated needs. Mothers were mainly responsible for administration of feeds and the majority reported giving three-hourly feeds. Feed supervision by the professional staff was poor and feed charts were poorly filled.

The acute phase lasted on average six days. A total of 43 children had a transition to F100, representing 64.2% of those who were alive by the end of one week. Feed volumes were rarely increased, however, after the transition period. This was due to failure of doctors to adjust feed volumes accordingly.

3.3. Caregiver's Knowledge and Practices 

Mothers were responsible for feed administration often with minimal supervision. Nutritionists were responsible for provision of feeds and the training of caregivers on how to give feeds. Sixty one caregivers were interviewed on day 7 of admission to assess knowledge and actual practices in care. Nineteen caregivers (31%) understood that starter milk F75 was a component of the treatment regime for children with severe malnutrition. However, most caregivers (69%) reported giving the correct three-hourly feeds day and night.

Back to Article Outline

4. Discussion 

According to this study, management of severe malnutrition remains a challenge at KNH, the national referral hospital of the Republic of Kenya, with critical deficiencies in care being observed in a majority of steps. Major shortfalls in care include treatment and prevention of hypoglycemia and hypothermia, delay in prompt start of therapy, especially initial re-feeding of children, and inadequate and erratic nursing care, in particular monitoring of feeds and fluids. However supplies of major commodities were generally good in contrast to the findings of Ashworth et al. in South Africa.¹³ Triage was appropriately performed and better than in other reports.

Children with severe malnutrition and diarrhoea were not nursed in ‘malnutrition rooms’ but in non-warmed diarrhoea rooms, together with well nourished children with diarrhoea. Thus, despite the availability of heaters (unlike the situation reported by Ashworth, et al.¹³), children did not benefit from them and although mothers were admitted with their children only 14% were instructed on how to keep children warm.

Because of the difficulty in diagnosis of dehydration in severe malnutrition and estimation of its severity, rehydration fluid should only be given intravenously if children are in shock. Severely malnourished children not in shock should be rehydrated orally using ReSoMal which has low sodium and high potassium. These guidelines were not adequately followed and a large number of children not documented to be in shock were indiscriminately given intravenous fluids, both at PFC and on the wards. Monitoring for over-hydration was not done and neither were volumes of fluids given properly recorded. Poor management of dehydration could be due to lack of knowledge about the dangers of over-hydration and also the limited number of nursing staff.

Infections are very common in malnourished children but can be difficult to diagnose because common signs, such as fever, inflammation and crepitations are often missing. Broad spectrum antibiotics are, therefore, routinely administered to hospitalized, severely malnourished children. In this study 98% (99/101) of children received antibiotics and 90% (91/101) received appropriate broad spectrum antibiotics including gram negative cover.

Children with severe malnutrition should be given small frequent feeds of starter formula (F75) and continue breastfeeding where applicable. In this study 55.4% (56/101) of children were fed with F75 with the rest being fed on porridge, cow's milk and some on routine ward diet. Ashworth et al. also found children being fed on full strength milk and adult meals.¹³ Feeding should be started immediately on admission. In this study there was a long delay before the first feeding and in particular children admitted at night were normally not fed until 09:00h the following day. This was despite the presence of starter formula F75 on the ward. This could be attributed to the perception by nurses that provision of feeds was solely the duty of the nutritionist and lack of awareness of the risk of hypoglycemia in severe malnutrition. Monitoring and computing daily feed requirements was rarely done in keeping with studies that have shown that activities that require frequent bedside decisions by physicians and nursing staff are often poorly done.²⁰, ²¹, ²² This failure to change feeds or increase volumes was mainly due to a lack of clear feed prescriptions on feed charts and failure of communication to the nutritionist and caregiver by the clinicians.

Most of the children were accompanied by caregivers who were responsible for feeding and oral rehydration of their children. Due to a shortage of nursing staff it was also noted that caregivers were responsible for monitoring and charting feeds, although this task was often poorly done, and there was no proper supervision system in place. Despite this we observed that most children's caregivers developed the ability to feed their children competently during the period of admission. This suggests that training of caregivers in basic duties such as feeding and documenting feeds, and identifying danger signs may be a useful way to relieve pressure on nurses and improve care.

Correcting the deficiencies observed in care to improve quality of care at KNH will require efforts to improve health system infrastructure and management. The ‘malnutrition rooms’ set aside for severe malnutrition are small and usually highly congested, with a single bed accommodating six children at times, making it hard to maintain adequate standards of hygiene. This explains, in part, why severely malnourished children are often admitted to open wards where they cannot be kept warm. Shortages of nurses and nutritionists also exacerbate the problems of caring for these high-dependency children. However, it is also clear that many health workers (including nutritionists) have a limited understanding of the needs of these patients and where expertise is available it may not be effectively used. Strategies that might provide considerable improvements in care might include the establishment of a specialized malnutrition unit or at least a specialized malnutrition team to co-ordinate care and educate health workers and caregivers.

This study demonstrates the gaps in care of the severely malnourished child in a national hospital. The results cannot be generalized to lower level hospitals, because KNH is a referral hospital, but previous reports indicate that in smaller hospitals the problems may be at least as bad.²³ The findings are of concern given that the hospital is a major teaching centre. Some deficiencies are linked to inadequate infra-structure, crowding and low numbers of nurses, thus care might be usefully improved with a greater focus on establishing a co-ordinated system for care of these highly vulnerable children.

Back to Article Outline

Authors’ contributions 

CN and GI identified the research problem. All the authors designed the study protocol. CN carried out the clinical assessment, data collection and data analysis. CN and GI drafted the manuscript. All the authors participated in the interpretation of the data, read and approved the final manuscript.

Back to Article Outline

Funding 

Funds from a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship support Dr. Mike English (#076827). These funders had no role in the design, conduct, analyses or writing of this study nor in the decision to submit for publication

Back to Article Outline

Conflict of interest 

None.

Back to Article Outline

Ethical approval 

The study was approved by KNH Ethics and Research Committee. Written consent was obtained from the parent/guardian for any child to be enrolled into the study.

Back to Article Outline

References 

1. World Health Organization. Management of severe malnutrition: a manual for physicians and other health workers. Geneva: WHO, 1999.
   • View In Article
2. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?. Lancet. 2003;361:2226–2234
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (3114 KB)
   • CrossRef
3. Scholfield C, Ashworth A. Why have mortality rates for severe protein energy malnutrition remained high?. Bull. WHO. 1996;74:223–229
   • View In Article
4. Rice AL, Sacco L, Hyder A, Black RE. Malnutrition as an underlying cause of childhood deaths associated with infectious diseases in developing countries. Bull WHO. 2000;78:1207–1221
   • View In Article
5. Central Bureau of Statistics. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2003: 155-167.
   • View In Article
6. Berkley J, Mwangi I, Griffiths K, Ahmed I, Mithwani S, English M, et al. Assessment of severe malnutrition among hospitalized children in rural Kenya: Comparison of weight for height and mid upper arm circumference. JAMA. 2005;294:591–597
   • View In Article
   • CrossRef
7. Allen SJ, Hammer C. Improving quality of care for severe malnutrition. Lancet. 2004;363:2089–2090
   • View In Article
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (42 KB)
   • CrossRef
8. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto G, Shibuya K, Black RE. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147–1152
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (611 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Bryce J, Terreri N, Victoria CG. Countdown to 2015: Tracking intervention coverage for child survival. Lancet. 2006;368:1067–1076
   • View In Article
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (472 KB)
   • CrossRef
10. Scholfield C, Ashworth A. Severe malnutrition in children: high case fatality rates can be reduced. Afr Health. 1997;19:17–18
    • View In Article
11. World Health Organization. Strategies for assisting health workers to modify and improve their skills: Developing quality health care, a process of change. WHO/EIP/OSD/00.1.2000.00. Geneva WHO
    • View In Article
12. Bhan MK, Bhandra M, Batil R. Management of the severely malnourished child; perspective from developing countries. BMJ. 2003;326:146–151
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
13. Ashworth A, Chopra M, McCoy D, Sanders D, Jackson D, Karaolis N, et al. WHO guidelines for management of severe malnutrition in rural South African hospitals; effect on case fatality and influence of operational factors. Lancet. 2004;363:1110–1115
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (97 KB)
    • CrossRef
14. Ministry of Health. Basic Pediatric Protocols (2006). Management of severe malnutrition.: page 20-22
    • View In Article
15. Morris J, Molyneux E. Reduced mortality from severe PEM following introduction of WHO protocol in children in Malawi. Arch. Dis. Child. 2003;88(suppl):A28
    • View In Article
16. Puoane T, Sanders D, Chopra M, Ashworth A, Strasser S, McCoy D, et al. Evaluating the clinical management of severely malnourished children: A study of two rural hospitals. S Africa. Med. J. 2001;91:137–141
    • View In Article
17. Cavalcante AA, Pinheiro LM, Monte C, Guimarães AR, Ashworth A. Treatment of malnutrition in Brazil; simple solutions to common problems. Tropical Doctor. 1998;28:95–97
    • View In Article
    • MEDLINE
18. Bernal C, Velásquez C, Alcaraz G, Botero J. Treatment of severe malnutrition in children: experience in implementing the WHO guidelines in Turbo. Colombia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(3):322–328
    • View In Article
19. Irimu G Wamae, Wasunna A, Fred Were, Ntoburi S, Opiyo N, et al. Developing and introducing evidence based clinical practice guidelines for serious illness in Kenya. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:799–804
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
20. Puoane T, Sanders D, Ashworth A, Chopra M, Strasser S, McCoy D. Improving the hospital management of malnourished children by participatory research. International journal for quality in health care. 2004;16(1):31–40
    • View In Article
21. Karaolis N, Jackson D, Ashworth A, Sanders D, Sogaula N, McCoy D, et al. WHO guidelines for severe malnutrition: are they feasible in rural African hospitals?. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:198–204
    • View In Article
    • CrossRef
22. Falbo AR, Alves JG, Batista Filho M, Cabral-Filho JE. Implementation of World Health Organization guidelines for management of severe malnutrition in a hospital in north east Brazil.. Cad. Saude. Publica, Rio de Jeneiro. 2006;22:561–570
    • View In Article
23. English M, Esamai F, Wasunna A, Were F, Ogutu B, Wamae A, et al. Delivery of paediatric care at the first-referral level in Kenya. Lancet. 2004;364:1622–1629
    • View In Article
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (247 KB)
    • CrossRef